Legal Opinion

Sykes v. Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 12, 2008No. 3:07-cv-00660PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES R. SPENCER, Chief Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 90) by Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation and a Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Docket No. 96) by Lisa and Seth Sykes, on behalf of their son, Wesley Sykes. For the reasons stated below, Bayer’s Motion shall be GRANTED and Sykes’ Motion shall be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

I

In 1995, Lisa received an injection of HypRho-D while she was pregnant with Wesley to prevent him from developing hemolytic disease of the newborn. Hy-pRho-D, which is…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Lucas v. Henrico County School BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
  2. William v. AES Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
  3. Ball v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
  4. Powell v. Diehl Woodworking Machinery, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
  5. TORKIE-TORK v. WyethDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API