Legal Opinion
Prudential Resources Corp. v. Plunkett
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided June 8, 1979PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LESTER, Judge.
Prudential Resources Corporation sought a judgment pursuant to KRS 418.005 et seq. declaring that it had not lost the right to exercise an option to purchase an oil and gas leasehold held by Mack K. Plunkett. The Jackson Circuit Court dismissed the suit when it determined that Prudential was obligated to comply with a forum selection clause in the agreement between Prudential and Plunkett, which designated Dallas County, Texas, as the site for any litigation concerning the contract. Prudential, in this appeal, urges that we permit resolution of the controversy in the Jackson…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lewis v. American Family Insurace GroupKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
- Fite & Warmath Const. Co., Inc. v. Mys Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wallace Hardware Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Bill Abrams, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Professional Ins. Corp. v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- General Engineering Corporation v. Martin Marietta Alumina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- High Life Sales Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.