Legal Opinion
Matter of Breen
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1992No. SB-90-0043-D. Disciplinary Commission No. 5-2170PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLABORNE, Court of Appeals Judge, Department E.
The State Bar of Arizona charged Dennis M. Breen, III, Respondent, with several violations of the Arizona Code of Professional Responsibility, Rule 29(a), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A Ariz.Rev. Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) (1973).1
A formal complaint was filed against Respondent, and a hearing was held before State Bar Local Hearing Committee 5-D (“Committee”). The Committee concluded that Respondent violated several ethical rules by repeatedly engaging in activities which resulted in obvious existing and potential conflicts of interest.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mosser v. DarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Retter v. RetterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Matter of BreenArizona Supreme Court · 1992