Legal Opinion

Mosser v. Darrow

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 7, 1951No. 461PublishedCited by 252 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

The principal question here concerns personal liability of a reorganization trustee who, although making no personal profit, permitted key employees to profit from trading in securities of the debtors’ subsidiaries. Upon a long record, controlling facts have been found with little disagreement.-

In 1935, the United States District Court appointed respondent Darrow as reorganization trustee for two common-law trusts. These had functioned as holding companies and their principal assets were the securities of twenty-seven underlying companies, each of which owned improved real estate and had its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowden v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Snyder v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Davis v. PrestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. In Re Federal Facilities Realty Trust. Darrow v. Mosser. Guild v. DarrowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950

3Cited by252 opinions

  1. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Dirks v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. LeBlanc v. SalemCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API