Legal Opinion
Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 17, 1985No. Nos. 105, 262, 393 to 396, Dockets 83-4165, 83-4171, 84-4077, 84-4079, 84-4105 and 84-4107PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge.
Since the end of World War II Americans’ overwhelming preference for the use of their private automobiles has been the primary cause of a seriously eroded public transport. As a result, the intercity passenger bus industry in the United States is in a state of decline that shows little sign of turning about. During the depths of the depression in the 1930’s there was widespread concern over the creation of an oversupply of passenger transportation. To meet this concern, Congress in 1935 empowered the Interstate Commerce Commission to bring about equality of regulation…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Francisco Soler v. G. & U., Inc., and Secretary, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Hudson Transit Lines, Inc., Hudson Transit Corp. v. United States of America, Interstate Commerce Commission and Pine Hill-Kingston Bus Corp., Hudson Transit Lines, Inc., Hudson Transit Corp. v. United States of America, Interstate Commerce Commission and Adirondack Transit Lines, Inc., American Bus Association, Intervenor. State of New Jersey, Dept. Of Transportation v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Funbus Systems, Inc. v. State of California Public Utilities Commission, Airport Service, Inc., Real Party in Interest. Interstate Commerce Commission, Applicant for Intervention-Appellant. Funbus Systems, Inc. v. State of California Public Utilities Commission, Airport Service, Inc., Real Party in Interest. Interstate Commerce Commission, Applicant for Intervention-Appellant. Airport Service, Incorporated, State of California and Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Intervenors-Petitioners v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Funbus Systems, Inc., Real Party-Intervenor. Airport Service, Incorporated, State of California and Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Intervenors-Petitioners v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Lounge Car Tours Charter Company, Inc., Real Party-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Funbus Systems, Inc. v. State of California Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Francisco Soler v. G. & U., Inc., and Secretary, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987