Legal Opinion

Funbus Systems, Inc. v. State of California Public Utilities Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 30, 1986No. Nos. 84-6170, 84-6171, 85-7104 and 85-7105PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCON, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated cases present a common novel issue: Does section 6 of the Bus Regulatory Reform Act, 49 U.S.C. § 10922 (partial rev. 1985) (hereinafter Bus Act) authorize the Interstate Commerce Commission (hereinafter ICC) to issue certificates permitting motor carriers to conduct intrastate services which operate independently of their interstate operations?

In appeal nos. 85-7104 and 85-7105, petitioner Airport Service, Inc. (hereinafter ASI) seeks review of two final orders of the ICC: the first (no. 85-7104) on Funbus Systems, Inc.’s (hereinafter Funbus) and the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Funbus Systems, Inc. v. State of California Public Utilities Commission, Airport Service, Inc., Real Party in Interest. Interstate Commerce Commission, Applicant for Intervention-Appellant. Funbus Systems, Inc. v. State of California Public Utilities Commission, Airport Service, Inc., Real Party in Interest. Interstate Commerce Commission, Applicant for Intervention-Appellant. Airport Service, Incorporated, State of California and Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Intervenors-Petitioners v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Funbus Systems, Inc., Real Party-Intervenor. Airport Service, Incorporated, State of California and Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Intervenors-Petitioners v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Lounge Car Tours Charter Company, Inc., Real Party-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Aspen Limousine Service, Inc. v. Colorado Mountain Express, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API