Clark v. City of Kent
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 May a city that pays its employees twice per month, in order to facilitate bookkeeping, maintain a payroll system in which wages earned up to 14 days before each payday are withheld from a current pay period and paid on the following regular payday? We hold that WAC 296-128--035 does not preclude such a system. Accordingly, we reverse the summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs, who are employees of the city of Kent (City), and remand for further proceedings.
Cox, J.
¶2 The City pays its police department employees (employees) on established paydays on the 5th and 20th of each month. All…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Allison v. Housing Authority of City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Champagne v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Champagne v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Raz Yaron, V. Sierra ConleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- Almquist v. City of RedmondCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Almquist v. City of RedmondCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007