Legal Opinion
Champagne v. Thurston County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 14, 2008No. 79209-7PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
178 P.3d 936 (2008)
Gene CHAMPAGNE, Cary Brown, Roland Knorr, and Christopher Scanlon, individuals and as representatives of a class of Thurston County overtime eligible employees, Petitioners,
v.
THURSTON COUNTY, a political subdivision of the state of Washington, Respondent.
No. 79209-7.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued September 27, 2007.
Decided February 14, 2008.
William B. Aitchison, Attorney at Law, Mark A. Crabtree, Portland, OR, Hillary H. McClure, Aitchison & Vick Inc., Seattle, WA, for Petitioners.
Jeffrey George Fancher, Attorney at Law, Olympia, WA, Michael Barr King, Talmadge…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Biggs v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- O'Brien v. Town of AgawamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Drinkwitz v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Sources for Sustainable Communities v. Building Industry Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Washington State Nurses Ass'n v. Sacred Heart Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Yakima County v. LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Yakima County v. Yakima County Law Enforcement Officers GuildCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Burchfiel v. Boeing Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.