Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Champagne v. Thurston County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2008No. 79209-7PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Thurston County (County) pays its

Fairhurst, J.

employees for nonregular wages (e.g., overtime wages) at the close of the month subsequent to when the nonregular wages were earned. Petitioners Gene Champagne, Cary Brown, Roland Knorr, and Christopher Scanlon (hereinafter collectively referred to as Champagne) work as corrections officers for the Thurston County Sheriff’s Office. Champagne challenges a published Court of Appeals decision that dismissed his claims under the Washington Minimum Wage Act (MWA), chapter 49.46 RCW, wage payment act (WPA), chapter 49.48 RCW, and wage rebate act…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Biggs v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. O'Brien v. Town of AgawamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. Drinkwitz v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Sources for Sustainable Communities v. Building Industry Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Washington State Nurses Ass'n v. Sacred Heart Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Yakima County v. LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. Yakima County v. Yakima County Law Enforcement Officers GuildCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Burchfiel v. Boeing Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API