Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Webber

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1931No. File No. 6978PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This action was -commenced to recover damages for the death of plaintiffs’ sheep, alleged to have been sustained ■by reason of the negligence of the defendants in compounding and administering a remedy for intestinal worms. The defendants are veterinarians engaged in the practice in the city of Sioux Falls and vicinity, and the plaintiff, Enoch Erickson, was the tenant of the three other plaintiffs named. The plaintiffs were the joint 'owners of the ninety sheep to- which the remedy was administered by the defendants.

It appears from the evidence .that the treatment was completed during the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Crouch v. National Livestock Remedy Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Reagan v. McKibbenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Murphy v. Sioux Falls Serum Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Brown v. H. K. Mulford Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. MeredithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  2. Johnson v. NorfolkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Keatley v. Hanna Chevrolet Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Piper v. Barber Transportation Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. WadeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API