Legal Opinion

Dolben Co. v. Friedmann

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided January 2, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrennan, J.

The defendant, Tamar Friedmann (“Friedmann”), appeals from the judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, The Dolben Co., Inc. (“Dolben”), for possession of apartment 8-20C at 100 Memorial Drive in Cambridge, Massachusetts as well as unpaid rent and attorney’s fees totaling $42,131.80.

Proceedings in this summary process action spanned nearly a full year in the Cambridge District Court, consuming some twenty court dates from complaint filing on May 9,2005 to the defendant’s notice of appeal on May 8,2006. They included four days of a jury-waived trial spread over a five-month period. During…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ayash v. Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. Hershenow v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Haddad v. GonzalezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Preferred Mutual Insurance v. GamacheMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Fidelity Management & Research Co. v. OstranderMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sapienza-Cote v. Carabetta Management Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
  2. DeBettencourt v. AronsonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
  3. Ciriello v. FortinMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API