Legal Opinion

Sanfilippo v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 2004No. 26048PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Presiding Judge.

Erik Thomas Sanfilippo (“Appellant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief. Appellant alleges that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise, as an issue in his direct appeal, that the trial court plainly erred and abused its discretion in overruling his trial counsel’s objection to a portion of the State’s closing argument.

On October 9, 2000 at 8:30 P.M., Chuck Colbert (“Colbert”), a trooper with the Missouri State Highway Patrol, and deputies…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. State v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tilley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Blackmon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. WILLIAM SCOTT SOURS, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API