Legal Opinion

WILLIAM SCOTT SOURS, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 18, 2019No. SD35776Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM SCOTT SOURS, ) ) Movant-Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. SD35776 ) Filed: July 18, 2019 STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Respondent-Respondent. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JASPER COUNTY Honorable Gayle L. Crane, Judge AFFIRMED William Scott Sours (“Sours”), appeals from a judgment of the motion court denying his pro se Rule 29.15 1 motion to set aside his conviction of the class C felony of receiving stolen property. Because the motion court’s decision to deny relief after an evidentiary hearing was not clearly erroneous, we affirm. 1 All rule references are to Missouri Court Rules (2019).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Walter Barton v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  4. Latham v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  5. Lewis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API