Legal Opinion

Williams v. Medukas

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 2005No. Docket 260375PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition. We reverse and remand. This appeal is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).

Edwin Williams was involved in a motor vehicle accident with defendant. X-rays revealed that Williams sustained a fractured right shoulder and a fractured left hand. An orthopedic surgeon placed Williams’ left arm in a cast and immobilized his right arm with a double sling. For one month following the accident Williams’ arms were immobilized, and his wife was required to assist him with his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kreiner v. FischerMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Kern v. Blethen-ColuniMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fisher v. BlankenshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Netter v. BowmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Caiger v. OakleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Benefiel v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Denzer v. Trumbull Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API