Legal Opinion

Gennes v. Yellow Book of New York, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

George R. Peck, J.

*520The defendant’s motion for summhry judgment and the plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment are determined as follows:

Plaintiffs, as a class, are suing to recoup monies which they maintain were improperly withheld by the defendant. These funds fall into two categories. The first they claim are illegally imposed “charge backs”; the second is the failure to pay for accrued vacation time. i

Findings of Fact

The employment duties of the plaintiffs centered around the obtaining and renewing of subscriptions for advertisements, which can be placed in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hudacs v. Frito-Lay, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Engstrom v. Kinney System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sosnowy v. A. Perri Farms, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  2. Gennes v. Yellow Book of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Levy v. Verizon Information Services Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  4. David Cohan v. Medline Industries, IncorporaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. David Cohan v. Medline Industries, IncorporaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API