Legal Opinion

Engstrom v. Kinney System, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 31, 1997PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.), entered March 13, 1996, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, defendants’ motion for summary judgment granted and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants-appellants dismissing the complaint.

Starting in 1976, plaintiff Engstrom worked as the sole cashier at defendant Kinney’s garage at 150 West 38th Street. Since at least 1990, her shift began at 11:00 a.m. and ended at 7:00 p.m. In August…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. SHAD Alliance v. Smith Haven MallNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Pace University v. New York City Commission on Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Suozzi v. ParenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kalsi v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
  2. Schwaller v. Squire Sanders & DempseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Gennes v. Yellow Book of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Terranova v. Liberty Lines Transit, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Unotti v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API