Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Wal-Feld Company, Inc., Bankrupt. Goldman & Frier, Attorneys for Trustee

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 27, 1965No. 29559_1PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUMBARD, Chief Judge:

Goldman & Frier appeal from an order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York which confirmed the $11,000 allowance recommended by the referee for the firm’s services as attorneys for the trustee in a Chapter XI proceeding. The appellants seek to have the allowance increased to $25,000, the amount which they originally requested. No one has appeared in opposition to their appeal.

The request for $25,000 is based on a claim of 1150 hours of work on the trustee’s behalf. Accepting this claim, $11,000 amounts only to about $10 per hour, a rate which would…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Hudson & Manhattan Railroad Company, Debtor. Lamb, Blake, Hutchinson & Dunne and Strasser, Spiegelberg, Fried & Frank, Hudson & Manhattan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  3. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. National Association of Concerned Veterans, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Secretary of Defense, Appellants/cross-Appellees. Mark Green and Corporate Accountability Research Group v. Department of Commerce, Beverly L. B. Parker v. Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  5. In re Imperial "400" National, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API