Legal Opinion

Wagh v. Nimmo

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1983No. 82-1790PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Dr. Premanand V. Wagh filed this employment discrimination suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et. seq., claiming that the Veterans Administration discharged him from his position as a biochemist because of his race and national origin.

Following a bench trial, the district court1 found (1) that Dr. Wagh, a native of India, established a prima facie case of employment discrimination; (2) that the Veterans Administration produced sufficient evidence to show a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for Dr. Wagh’s dismissal — he did not perform the job for which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charles L. Tolliver v. J.R. Yeargan James E. Halligan Charles W. Oxford James E. Martin University of ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. Poindexter v. Kansas CityDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983
  3. Barton S. MANN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MILGRAM FOOD STORES, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API