Legal Opinion
Barton S. MANN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MILGRAM FOOD STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 2, 1984No. 83-1410PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
Barton Mann appeals from an adverse judgment of the district court on his religious discrimination claim brought under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(l) (1976). He argues that the district court 1 was clearly erroneous in its finding that he was not in training for a produce manager’s position, that Milgram’s made reasonable efforts to accommodate his religious needs, that he was not subject to retaliatory discipline and that his layoff was not the result of religious discrimination. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
Mann’s claim arises out of his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lehman BROWN, Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fatma Floyd v. State of Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Family Services, Rehabilitation Services for the Blind Gary Stenger, in His Official Capacity Carmen Schulz, in Her Official and Individual Capacity for the Missouri Rehabilitation Services for the BlindCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Floyd v. State of Missouri Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999