Legal Opinion

Poindexter v. Kansas City

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided October 28, 1983No. 83-0171-CV-W-1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

JOHN W. OLIVER, Senior District Judge.

I. Introduction

This employment discharge discrimination case was maintained under both Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f) (Count I of plaintiff’s complaint), and Section 1981, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Count II of plaintiff’s complaint). Jury trial was waived in regard to plaintiff’s Section 1981 claim.

Both parties, in accordance with this Court’s pretrial order, filed proposed findings of fact and proposed conclusions of law. The number of issues of disputed fact was substantially decreased by the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dyer v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Poindexter v. Kansas City, Mo. WaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. Adams v. Arizona SenateDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API