Legal Opinion

Smith v. Chicago, North Shore & Milwaukee Railroad

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoNes, J.

It is one of the grounds of negligence alleged that the train of defendant was running at such an excessive speed, that it could not be properly controlled by the motorman. The highest rate of speed claimed was fifty miles per hour, as found by the jury. The line was straight and in *262the open country. The plaintiff relies on no statute or ordinance governing the rate of speed.' This question has several times been before this court. In an opinion by Mr. Justice Timlin the court said:

“The highest estimate of speed is fifty miles per hour. We cannot close our eyes to the fact that in order to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Isabel v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  2. Keyser v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. GrablinNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Thomas v. Phila. & Reading R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Chicago City Railway Co. v. RoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Interstate Motor Lines v. NealSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Matsumoto v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  3. Matsumoto v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API