Legal Opinion

Interstate Motor Lines v. Neal

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 7, 1947No. 15,854PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Luxford

An action in tort for damages. Plaintiff in error was defendant, and defendant in error was plaintiff, below.

About seven o’clock P.M. on November 7, 1944, a freight train ran into defendant’s tractor and trailer at a railway crossing in Larimer county, Colorado. The locomotive was derailed and turned over, and both the engineer and fireman sustained personal injuries for which they brought separate suits and enjoyed favorable verdicts and judgments.

Plaintiff’s evidence indicated (defendant offered none) that the train, as it approached the crossing, was proceeding in a westerly direction at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. CrismanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Westerkamp v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  3. Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. HonakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  4. Jordan v. OsborneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buchholz v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. Buchholz v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  3. Interstate Motor Lines v. KleinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  4. Motor Lines v. KleinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API