Legal Opinion

United States v. Aadal

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 27, 1968No. Nos. 66 Cr. 458, 67 Cr. 592PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ON SECOND VOUCHER

MOTLEY, District Judge.

On December 4, 1967, this court certified that compensation totaling $978.10 for the services and expenses of two court-appointed counsel represented fair compensation for protracted representation and, therefore, payment of that amount, although it exceeded the limitation of $500 contained in the Criminal Justice Act of 1964, was necessary. The certification and a memorandum setting forth this court’s reasons for so certifying were sent to the Chief Judge of this Circuit for approval.

On January 9, 1968, Chief Judge Lumbard approved of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. NaplesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ayestas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. United States v. JamesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1969
  3. People v. AtkinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. United States v. HarperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1970
  5. United States v. HildebrandtDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API