Legal Opinion
State v. Musil
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 22, 1996No. 20257PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
John Musil (defendant) appeals his conviction for the class C misdemeanor of failing to stop a watercraft after having been signaled to do so by a member of the Missouri state water patrol. § 306.132, RSMo Supp.1993. This court affirms.
Initially, this court notes the absence of a brief filed on behalf of the State of Missouri notwithstanding the requirement of § 56.060.1, RSMo 1994, that:
If any misdemeanor case is taken to the court of appeals by appeal [the prosecuting attorney] shall represent the state in the case in the court and make out and cause to be printed, at the expense of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- State v. ParkhurstSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- State v. ChamberlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. HendersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- City of Montgomery v. ChristianMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. CarlockMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. WeberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- City of Joplin v. MarstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.