Legal Opinion

State v. Weber

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1999No. 22404PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge.

Larry Weber (defendant) attempts to appeal the assessment of certain items as costs in a case in which he was charged with driving while intoxicated. § 577.010, RSMo 1994. For the reasons that follow, the appeal is dismissed.

Rule 29.07(e) requires that a judgment of conviction be entered “set[ting] forth *257the plea, the verdict or findings, and the adjudication and sentence.” Absent a final judgment, no appeal can be taken. State v. O’Connell, 726 S.W.2d 742, 749 (Mo. banc 1987); State v. Shipman, 560 S.W.2d 603, 604 (Mo.App.1978).

The legal file component of the record on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. State v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. State v. BowlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State v. HarringtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. MichaelsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. NenningerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State v. PaulMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. City of Neosho v. DoyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State v. JansenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API