Legal Opinion

Mounce v. Mounce

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1996No. 4:94-cv-00747PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HOLMES, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Peggy Mounce and a Motion for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Dolores Mounce, individually and as personal representative of the estate of Timothy Mounce, deceased. The facts necessary to resolve these motions are not in dispute and are drawn largely from the stipulations of the parties.

I

Timothy Mounce was an employee of WIT-CO and received the benefits of the WITCO Benefit Plan up until the time of his death. The Collective Bargaining Agreement between WITCO Corporation, Concarb…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Windon Third Oil And Gas Drilling Partnership v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  5. Beatrice Hinds Carland v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wanda Crowder v. The Delta Air Line, Inc. Family-Care Savings PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Arkansas Chapter, NECA-IBEW Retirement Fund v. ChronisterDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2004
  3. Seaman v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  4. Wanda Crowder v. The Delta Air Line, Inc. Family-Care Savings PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API