Legal Opinion

Hoverstock v. Darrow

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1932No. 14,206PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeal, J.

Appellant, an automobile dealer at Topeka, Indiana, hereinafter referred to as “the vendor,” on April 26, 1928, sold and delivered to Eugene Darrow, one of the appellees herein, under a conditional-sales contract, a Chevrolet coupe for the sum of $600, of which $100 was paid at the time of delivery and the remaining $500 was to be paid in two semi-annual installments of $250 each, the first of which was due six months after the execution of the contract and the second was due 12 months after such execution. On May 1,1928, Eugene Darrow, hereinafter referred to as “the purchaser,” secured a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. . the Brooklyn Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Nordyke & Marmon Co. v. GeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Batts v. . SullivanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Commercial Credit Co. v. EisenhourArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. White v. GilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Foshee v. Daoust Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  2. Property Owners Insurance Co. v. HackIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Elliott v. Travelers InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Property Owners Insurance Co. v. HackIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Property Owners Insurance Co. v. HackIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API