Legal Opinion
White v. Gilman
California Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 1903No. S.F. No. 3187PublishedCited by 16 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
Action to compel a conveyance of real estate by Gilman to the plaintiff. The other defendants were fictitious persons, and as to them the action was dismissed. Findings and judgment were for the plaintiff, and defendant, Gilman, appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial. There is no appeal from the judgment.
Appellant’s contention is, that certain of the findings are not justified by the evidence, and this contention should be sustained.
One Rucker sold to plaintiff, White, a vacant lot in his addition to the town of Campbell for the price of $215, payable in monthly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carpenter v. Providence Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Ely v. ElyIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Cushing v. ThompsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1852
- McIntire v. PlaistedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1878
- Ridley v. EnnisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
3Cited by16 opinions
- Higgins v. Insurance Company of North AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Banerian v. O'MALLEYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Greco v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Alexander v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Russell v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.