Legal Opinion

Hall v. Hall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 3, 1984No. 8312DC33PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

I

The issue is whether defendant, who was not served with summons, made a general appearance which entitled the court to exercise jurisdiction over him. We answer in the affirmative, and thus affirm the trial court.

II

The following facts are not disputed:

Plaintiff-wife and defendant-husband separated while living in Okinawa. Plaintiff and the minor child born of the marriage moved to Fayetteville, North Carolina, where plaintiff purchased a home in her name and defendant’s. Defendant has not been a legal resident of North Carolina since 1964. He has been a legal resident of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Swenson v. ThibautCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Anderson Chevrolet/Olds, Inc. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Simms v. MASON'S STORES, INC.(NC-1)Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Lynch v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bethea v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Draughon v. Harnett County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API