Hall v. Hall
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
I
The issue is whether defendant, who was not served with summons, made a general appearance which entitled the court to exercise jurisdiction over him. We answer in the affirmative, and thus affirm the trial court.
II
The following facts are not disputed:
Plaintiff-wife and defendant-husband separated while living in Okinawa. Plaintiff and the minor child born of the marriage moved to Fayetteville, North Carolina, where plaintiff purchased a home in her name and defendant’s. Defendant has not been a legal resident of North Carolina since 1964. He has been a legal resident of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Swenson v. ThibautCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Anderson Chevrolet/Olds, Inc. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Simms v. MASON'S STORES, INC.(NC-1)Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Lynch v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bethea v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Draughon v. Harnett County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004