Legal Opinion
Harvey Barnett, Inc. v. Shidler
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 6, 2003No. Docket 02-1047PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Harvey Barnett, Inc. and Infant Swimming Research, Inc. (collectively, “ISR”) filed a complaint against three former employees, alleging state-law claims of misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment, as well as claims of unfair competition and deceptive trade practices under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act (“CCPA”), Colo.Rev.Stat. § 6-1-105. ISR further alleged federal claims of trademark infringement and misleading trade practices in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114 and 1125. Finding that ISR failed to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. MuleiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Hall v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Beer Nuts, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Clover Club Foods Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Perry v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- York v. City of Las CrucesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Wolfe Electric, Inc. v. DuckworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Altavion, Inc. v. Konica Minolta System Laboratory, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Catalyst & Chemical Services, Inc. v. Global Ground SupportDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Burnett v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.