Legal Opinion

State v. Knippling

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 2009No. 80848-1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, C.J.

¶1 — We granted review to determine whether Tucero Knippling’s 1999 superior court conviction for a most serious offense (second degree robbery) counts as a “strike” under the Persistent Offender Accountability Act (POAA), in light of the fact that Knippling was a juvenile at the time of that conviction and there is no indication on the judgment and sentence why he was before the superior court. We conclude that the State failed to establish that Knippling’s 1999 conviction is a strike under the POAA and, therefore, affirm the Court of Appeals’ determination that Knippling is not a persistent…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Re the Personal Restraint of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. BresolinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. WitherspoonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. SaenzWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State Of Washington v. Alan D. JenksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. State v. SaenzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. State v. SaenzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API