Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Bethesda Discount Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 1, 1978No. [No. 78, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

Plaintiffs-appellants, who were improperly charged $2.68 by the appellee, a company doing business under the Maryland Industrial Finance Daw, Code (1957), Article 11, Sections 163-205, seek to have their entire loan of $800 declared void and uncollectible. Whether or not they are entitled to this relief depends upon the answer to this question: Was the collection of the confessedly improper delinquent charge by the appellee the “result of an accidental or bona fide error of computation” within the meaning of Section 196 (C), of said Article 11?

The loan was effected by the execution of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. HiginbothomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Plitt v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. Finance Company, Inc. v. CattertonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Beyond Systems, Inc. v. Realtime Gaming Holding Co., LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Maryland Medical Service, Inc. v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. State Ex Rel. Turner v. Younker Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API