Legal Opinion

Davis v. Bud and Papa, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 8, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a personal injury case that stems from an altercation that occurred at a nightclub. The plaintiff alleges that she got into a confrontation with the club’s security personnel. In the ensuing scuffle, the plaintiff claims that a security guard tased her in the neck. She brought suit against the nightclub for assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”), and negligence. The defendant filed a motion for summary…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. Czekalski, Loni v. Peters, MaryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Daniels v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Tracy Stopford, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Jordan Preavy and Sean Preavy v. Milton Town School District and Milton Town School BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  3. Arias v. DyncorpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Owen v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Herzfeld v. BarmadaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API