Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Dorn

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 14, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

William J. Regan, S.

This is a discovery proceeding wherein petitioner seeks to examine the respondent, Norman Gr. Biehler, concerning certain knowledge or information that he may have with reference to books, records and leases which may relate to commissions due the decedent, a former real estate broker. Respondent has moved to dismiss this application for lack of jurisdiction. Warren’s Heaton, Surrogates’ Courts (vol. 3, § 236, par. 8, subd. [d]) states: “ It is obvious that it is only in those cases of which the surrogate has jurisdiction that it can make a decree directing either delivery…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. In re AmbruskoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. In re the Estate of StiassniNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  4. In re the Estate of HopkinsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of RungoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API