Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Hopkins

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 20, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Evans, S.

This is a discovery proceeding brought pursuant to the provisions of sections 205 and 206 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. The purpose of the proceeding is to compel the Syracuse Trust Company to pay to the petitioner, Mary E. O’Neil, administratrix c. t. a., the sum of $1,410.80 and interest, money belonging to the estate and claimed to have been diverted by Mr. O’Neil, the former executor of the will of the above-named decedent, and the Syracuse Trust Company. The last will and testament of the testatrix was duly admitted to probate in this court on April 20, 1931, and letters…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bischoff v. . Yorkville BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Van Alen v. . American National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of EhlertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  4. Cohnfeld v. . TanenbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Gilliland v. Lincoln-Alliance Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of DornNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API