Legal Opinion

Napa State Hospital v. Flaherty

California Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1901No. S.F. No. 2190PublishedCited by 47 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion. Tirey L. Ford, Attorney-General, and George L. Hughes, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

— The court below made an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the amended complaint, and this appeal is from the judgment, for the purpose of reviewing the order.

The complaint alleges that one John L. Flaherty, the son of defendant, was duly committed to the state insane asylum at Napa by order of the superior court, where he was regularly detained, supported, and maintained in pursuance of said order; that he had not, at the date of said commitment, and has not since, had any wife, child, or children of sufficient pecuniary ability to support him at said asylum, and that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spears v. Cty. of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. People Ex Rel. Moore v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Callet v. AliotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School District v. MannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Department of Mental Hygiene v. KirchnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API