Legal Opinion

Cook v. Continental Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 1, 1928No. 3 Div. 846PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellee insured appellant's property against loss or damage by fire. The policy is said by the parties to have been in the standard form. By its terms it insured appellant "against all direct loss or damage by fire, except as hereinafter provided." A later provision was expressed in this language: "This company will not be liable for loss caused directly or indirectly by invasion, insurrection, riot, civil war or commotion, or military or usurped power, or by order of any civil authority; or by theft, or by neglect of the insured to use all reasonable means to save and preserve the property…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Lynn Gas & Electric Co. v. Meriden Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. PlasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Illinois Automobile Ins. Exch. v. Southern Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Day v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Louisville N. R. Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Tonkin v. California Insurance Co. of San Francisco, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Ketona Chemical Corporation v. Globe Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Mobile Light R. Co. v. NicholasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Employers Insurance Co. of Alabama, Inc. v. RivesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API