Legal Opinion

P.C.S. v. J.E.B.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 1995No. 563Published

1Opinion of the Court

FORD ELLIOTT, Judge:

Appellant comes before us challenging an order entered in the support action below, July 18, 1994, directing blood testing of all relevant parties pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 5104. For the purposes of both confidentiality and convenience, we shall refer to the various parties as follows: plaintiff/appellee, P.C.S., shall be ‘Wife;” additional defendant/appellee, R.A.S., shall be “Husband;” and defendant/appellant, J.E.B., shall be “Putative Father.” Upon careful review of the issues raised on appeal by Putative Father, we affirm.

The facts underlying this appeal bear review.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. John M. v. Paula T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Jones v. TrojakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Christianson v. ElySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Noecker v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Frazier v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API