P.C.S. v. J.E.B.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FORD ELLIOTT, Judge:
Appellant comes before us challenging an order entered in the support action below, July 18, 1994, directing blood testing of all relevant parties pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 5104. For the purposes of both confidentiality and convenience, we shall refer to the various parties as follows: plaintiff/appellee, P.C.S., shall be ‘Wife;” additional defendant/appellee, R.A.S., shall be “Husband;” and defendant/appellant, J.E.B., shall be “Putative Father.” Upon careful review of the issues raised on appeal by Putative Father, we affirm.
The facts underlying this appeal bear review.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- John M. v. Paula T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Jones v. TrojakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Christianson v. ElySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Noecker v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Frazier v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.