Choate v. Hicks
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying appellant’s motion to file a “First Amended Answer and Counterclaim.” The trial court found, pursuant to Rule 74.01(b), that there was no just reason for delay. It concluded its judgment was “final for purposes of appeal.”1 The judgment is reversed. The case is remanded with directions.
Respondents sought partition of a tract of real estate located in Dallas County, Missouri, in which appellant claimed an interest by reason of a warranty deed dated October 30, 1992. Respondent Cyrus E. Potter, a single person according to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cantrell v. City of CaruthersvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- State ex rel. J.E. Dunn, Jr. & Associates, Inc. v. SchoenlaubSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Baker v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Stevinson v. Deffenbaugh Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Evergreen National Corp. v. Killian Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Joel Bianco Kawasaki Plus v. Meramec Valley BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Sloan-Odum v. WilkersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Cornerstone Mortgage, Inc. v. PonzarMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Bankcard Systems, Inc. v. Miller/Overfelt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Bankcard Systems, Inc. v. Miller/Overfelt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000