Legal Opinion
Bagdonas v. US DEPT. OF TREASURY BUREAU
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 13, 1995No. 94 C 2356PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Joseph K. Bagdonas (“Bagdonas”) alleges that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (“ATF”) acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner when it denied federal firearms disabilities relief to Bagdonas. Currently before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, Bagdonas’ motion for summary judgment is denied and the ATF’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
FACTS
The facts which follow are both material and undisputed. Bagdonas was convicted in the U.S. District Court,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Joseph K. Bagdonas v. Department of Treasury, United States of America, and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Louis A. Pontarelli v. United States Department Of The TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Owen v. MagawDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Pontarelli v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Pontarelli v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002