Legal Opinion

Graham v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1999No. 22607PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Chief Judge.

Patrick Dallas Graham (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 1 motion without an evidentiary hearing and its order denying his amended motion for recusal of judge. He contends the motion court erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing as his plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance by 1) failing to object to the participation of Movant’s former attorney in the prosecution of the underlying case against him and 2) failing to move to suppress files and records seized from Mov-ant’s business, Conquest…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  5. Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mendez v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Rhodes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Carden v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Fogle v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Smulls v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API