Bitterman v. Gluck

This action to recover damages for breach of contracts to employ plaintiff as defendants’ resident fur buyer in 1935 and 1936 resulted in a jury’s verdict in plaintiff’s favor for *337$6,500, with interest from July 28, 1936, on which a judgment was entered for $7,396.81. Defendants appeal. An examination of the record indicates that some amount is due from defendants to plaintiff, but the amount allowed is excessive, and numerous errors require reversal of the judgment in plaintiff’s favor.

The court improperly charged the jury that plaintiff could recover under the fifth cause of action (on the…