Kraus v. Chicago, B. & QR Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUNGER, District Judge.
The questions involved in this ease relate to the denial of the plaintiff’s motion to remand the case to the state court. The plaintiff helow is the plaintiff in error. He filed a petition in the state court of Wyoming against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company and P. D. Stone, alleging that the plaintiff, as an employé of the Union Tank Car Company, as a part of his duties, was painting and repairing one of his employer’s tank ears, which was then upon a railway track near an oil refinery in Wyoming, and that, while he was so employed, the defendants…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Illinois Central Railroad v. SheegogSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchwyhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McDonald v. LambertNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. of Hardinsburg v. Atchison, T. & S. F. RY. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Asher v. Pacific Power and Light CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1965
- Norwalk v. Air-Way Electric Appliance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Stone v. FosterDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.