Legal Opinion

Sandoffsky v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 1928No. 9091PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, PJ.

As to the weight of the evidence, we have reviewed the record and have come to the conclusion that, while the evidence is conflicting as in nearly all trials, it is of such a credible nature that under the rules of law guiding reviewing courts, the verdict cannot be disturbed.

Able counsel for plaintiff in error argues strenuously that the court committed prejudicial error in instructing the jury as to the question of conspiracy, for the reason that nothing appears in the record as to this offense.

From an examination of the record we see no error in this charge for the reason that…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HarristonOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Montgomery v. BagleyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  4. State v. HartOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State v. PinchOhio Court of Appeals · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API