State v. Harriston
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Nahra, Judge.
David Harriston appeals his convictions for possession of cocaine in an amount equal to or exceeding the bulk amount but in an amount less than three times that amount, in violation of R.C. 2925.03, and possession of criminal tools, in violation of R.C. 2923.24.
Defendant was indicted on the above charges as well as for trafficking in drugs, in violation of R.C. 2925.03, and for permitting a motor vehicle to be used for the commission of a felony drug abuse offense, in violation of R.C. 2925.13. Prior to trial, defendant filed a motion to suppress the search of his car and his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Sandoffsky v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. LongOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. CaldwellOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rogers v. HillOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Smith v. WunschOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.