Legal Opinion

State v. Hart

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1988No. 55082PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nahra, Judge.

Lascelle Hart, defendant-appellant, appeals his convictions for carrying a concealed weapon with a violence specification and having a weapon while under disability with a violence specification.

Prior to trial, defendant filed a motion to suppress evidence found in a search of the automobile in which he was a passenger. Because the case was being tried to the court, the trial judge decided to rule on the motion after hearing the trial testimony.

At trial, Officer Ollie Rogers testified that on December 9, 1986 in the early morning, he and his partner Carl Walker were on routine…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. ChattonOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. KuligOhio Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. RetherfordOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. State v. VenhamOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. SandersOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. City of Toledo v. ElkinToledo Municipal Court · 1994
  5. State v. GainesOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API