Legal Opinion
Pure, Ltd. v. National Beverage Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 13, 1993No. 92-15144PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
5 F.3d 539
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
PURE, LTD., a Hawaii corporation
Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
Shasta Beverages, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellee.
No. 92-15144.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Aug. 9,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- American Protein Corporation v. Ab Volvo and Volvo Lastvagnar Ab, as Successors in Interest to Beijerinvest Ab, Beijer Industries, Inc. And Bo LyckeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- City of Vernon v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Chung v. Animal Clinic, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Charles E. Wolfe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hi-Pac, Ltd. v. Avoset Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1997