Legal Opinion

Hi-Pac, Ltd. v. Avoset Corp.

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided September 22, 1997No. Civ. 96-00763 ACKPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KAY, Chief Judge.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

This ease involves an alleged agreement between Avoset Corporation, Avoset Food Corporation or Avoset International 1 and Hi-Pac, Limited (“Hi-Pac” or “plaintiff’). The defendants are packagers and suppliers of perishable foods, i.e., dairy products, based in California, and Hi-Pac is a Hawaii corporation that distributes food to government retail outlets, food services and distribution centers. In October of 1993, the defendants allegedly entered into an agreement whereby they…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Lewis Eisenberg v. Insurance Company of North America, Cigna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API