Legal Opinion
Choimbol v. Fairfield Resorts, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided March 2, 2006No. Civ.A. 2:05CV463PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
JACKSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Fairfield Resort’s, Inc. (“Fairfield”) Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint under the Fair Labor Standard Act of 1938 (“FLSA”). Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Fair-field moves for dismissal of Count Two (Unjust Enrichment) and Count Four (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) and RICO conspiracy). For the reasons stated below, Fair-field’s Motion to Dismiss Count Two and Count Four is DENIED. 1
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
For the purposes of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- American Chiropractic Ass'n v. Trigon Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Adams v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Proctor v. Metropolitan Money Store Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Neild v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Robinson v. Fountainhead Title Group Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Field v. GMAC LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- Baldino's Lock & Key Service, Inc. v. Google, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.