Ward v. Parkford
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiff commenced an action to quiet title against a large number of defendants. One of the defendants, E. A. Parksford, appeared and answered. In his answer he denied the material allegations of the plaintiff’s complaint and set forth a special defense in which he pleaded certain facts which he claimed would constitute an equitable estoppel that would preclude the plaintiff from any recovery. Still later the defendant Parkford filed a cross-complaint. The plaintiff answered the cross-complaint and a trial was had in the trial court on all of the issues so made by the pleadings. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blankman v. VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- County of Sonoma v. StofenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- De Frieze v. QuintCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Baker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Ball v. KehlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dreyer v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930