Legal Opinion

Ward v. Parkford

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 1925No. Docket No. 5176PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action to quiet title against a large number of defendants. One of the defendants, E. A. Parksford, appeared and answered. In his answer he denied the material allegations of the plaintiff’s complaint and set forth a special defense in which he pleaded certain facts which he claimed would constitute an equitable estoppel that would preclude the plaintiff from any recovery. Still later the defendant Parkford filed a cross-complaint. The plaintiff answered the cross-complaint and a trial was had in the trial court on all of the issues so made by the pleadings. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blankman v. VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. County of Sonoma v. StofenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. De Frieze v. QuintCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Baker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Ball v. KehlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dreyer v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API